Click here to find info to send email to CQD Click here to find info to send email to Miller Associates
Updates on Hot Topics/EventsCQD Home PageListing of past CQD articlesConference reporting on past eventsExternal links to other maritime companiesMiller Associates home pageSend email or call CQD or Miller

Conference Reports
Day 1 (2/25/02)
Day 2 (2/26/02)
Day 3 (2/27/02)
Day 3: second 1/2
 

Program Agenda

11th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species
Hosted by US Army Engineer Research and
Development Center
February 25 to March 1, 2002
Hilton Alexandria Mark Center, Alexandria, Virginia

11th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species

Day 1:  Monday, February 25, 2002


 

Reporting by Chris Swanson,
Managing Editor, CQD Journal

Alexandria, VA – Feb 25, 2002;  A message to those who did not get enough international flair from the Olympics in Salt Lake City, Utah – Come to Alexandria, Virginia.  Here, at the 11th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species you will find over 500 experts from 18 countries gathered together to compete against a global threat.  The menace they battle is invasive species, and it is a menace that does not recognize countries, borders or individuals.

 

Unlike the Olympics, gold, silver and bronze medals do not get awarded to these competitors.  That does not mean these scientists are not enthusiastic about their work.  In Monday's sessions, presenters representing Russia, New Zealand, Zambia, Argentina, Switzerland and the United States discussed invasive species problems in their nations.  The challenges they face are formidable.  The rewards for their efforts are not.

 

Randy Westbrook of the US Geological Survey may have explained their motivation best.  He said the scientists defining invasive species policy are developing a new conservation ethic.  He hopes their work will train today's children to learn to think about invasive species in the same manner that we learned about littering.  People avoid littering today, not because laws tell us not to, but because our hearts tell us it is wrong.  When the public can treat invasive species threats in the same manner, then truly these global competitors, these scientists, will have earned themselves a gold medal.

 

Following are brief highlights from a number of sessions for February 25th:
The following reports are based on presentations made at the 11th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species, February 25, 2002.  Opinions and estimates are those of the Presenter's unless otherwise noted.  CQD Journal for the Maritime Environment Industry makes no assertions as to the validity of the statements or opinions and cannot be held responsible for any of the information or claims contained therein.  We make every effort to report as accurately as possible, as presented by the speakers during the session. 

Invasive Species – a global concern bubbling to the surface presented by Jeffrey A. McNeeley

Biosecurity Legislation, structure and operation in New Zealand, presented by Geoffrey Hicks

International Situation in Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS)

Overview of Non-indigenous Aquatic Species in the United States presented by Pam Fuller, US Geological Survey

Synergistic Impacts of Multiple Invasions , presented by Anthony Ricciardi, McGill University

 

Invasive Species – a global concern bubbling to the surface presented by Jeffrey A. McNeeley
Email address: 
jeffrey.mcneely@iucn.org

Chief Scientist from the World Conservation Union in Switzerland, Jeff McNeeley began the day's sessions.  Today's global economy carries considerable costs, said McNeeley, and invasive alien species is one of the biggest problems yet the least recognized.


 

McNeeley outlined two overall invasive alien species problems:

    1) Purposeful introductions that go awry and,

    2) Accidental introductions that cause harm.

Both problems bear the question of who must pay the costs associated with the resultant damage from the invasive species.

 

He suggested an overall plan for managing alien invasive species.  Regarding intentional introductions:

    a) experts must consider all intentional introductions carefully and,

    b) they must improve the science to predict the potential costs &/or benefits.

Accidental introductions management involves:

    c) improving management of the control pathways and,

    d) improving overall management techniques.

 

McNeeley believes more focus should go to alerting the World Trade Organization of the seriousness of the invasive alien species issue.  The public should also be shown the links between global trade benefits and costs of invasive alien species.

 

 

Biosecurity Legislation, structure and operation in New Zealand, presented by Geoffrey Hicks.
Email address: 
ghicks@doc.govt.nz

 

Geoff Hicks spoke about New Zealand's legislation aimed to reduce potential invasive species infestations.  The two major pieces of invasive species legislation in New Zealand are:

  • Biosecurity Act of 1993 – controls unintentional introductions
     
  • Hazardous Substance and New Organisms Act of '96 – controls deliberate introduction of new organisms.

 

Biosecurity Act

  • Applies a risk management based approach to control
     
  • Emphasizes the importance of consulting with local, expert and tribal stakeholders.

 

Under the Biosecurity Act, the New Zealand Dept. of Agriculture and Forestry is responsible for the bulk of species control although it is specifically responsible for land and freshwater incursions.  Other departments such as Health, Conservation and the Ministry of Fisheries are responsible for other incursions such as pests, diseases and marine incursions.  Agriculture and Fisheries gets about 95% of the funding and control decisions.

 

Hicks felt the Biosecurity Act has performed "OK" to date.  Improvements to change the pre-structured framework of funding and control are under consideration.

 

International Situation in Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS)

International Cooperation in AIS Research in Europe, Vadim Panov, GAAS, Russia.  Email address:  gaas@zin.ru

Overview of Regional Invasive Species Issues in Africa – Musanda Mumba, Zambia.  Email address:  m.mumba@geog.ucl.ac.uk

Argentina's Freshwater Systems: Aliens in Wonderland – Pablo Vigliano, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Argentina. 
Email address: 
pviglia@crub.uncoma.edu.ar

 

Panov, Musonda and Vigliano gave international perspective to the problems of invasive species.  Their presentations highlighted the dire situation faced in underdeveloped countries, particularly in South America and Africa.

 

Mumba showed a series of slides taken recently in Zambia.  The invasion of water hyacinths is choking lake, river and wetland systems such that local fishing economies are devastated and hydroelectric facilities have been damaged.  She also illustrated the damage from purposeful alien species introduction such as the Nile Perch by the sport fishing industry in Lake Victoria.  According to Mumba, almost all freshwater ecosystems in Africa have been affected by some form of invasive species.

 

 

The theme of Vigliano's speech could be "We Don't Know."  Such is the case in Argentina where a struggling economy means little focus us placed upon aquatic environmental issues such as non-indigenous invasions.  He described a host of identified invasions in Argentina's waters ranging from mollusks to salmon.  Vigliano said there are no plans, no contingencies and virtually nothing is being done to combat their invasive species problems.

 

 

Overview of Non-indigenous Aquatic Species in the United States presented by Pam Fuller, US Geological Survey
Email address: 
pam_fuller@usgs.gov

 

Monday afternoon sessions focused on the host continent – North America, specifically the United States and Canada.  Pam Fuller kicked off the sessions with an overview of non-indigenous aquatic species in the US.

 

Individuals in the shipping industry may be surprised to find out that ballast water is not the most significant pathway of introduction for the U.S.  According to Fuller, while shipping is the most significant pathway of introduction for marine  invertebrates, stocking and aquarium releases are the most significant pathway for fishes.  Other vectors include baitfish and food importation.

 

Geographically, Florida and California are the states hit hardest in terms of numbers of successful invasions.  Examples of invasions by region include:

  • Great Lakes – zebra mussel & Chinook salmon
     
  • Central US – common carp
     
  • Interior and West – trout and other non-native introductions of sport fish
     
  • Marine & Coastal – very recently the lion fish has been found inhabiting coastal zones in Georgia, Carolinas and Long Island, NY.

 

 

 

Synergistic Impacts of Multiple Invasions , presented by Anthony Ricciardi, McGill University.
Email address: 
tony.ricciardi@MCGILL.ca

 

Ricciardi overwhelmed the audience with a distressing account of multiple invasion scenarios.  He described the situation of Invasional Meltdown, whereby one species invasion can promote other species invasions irrespective of whether the two species have a direct inter-relationship.  Multiple invasions can have a synergistic impact, meaning the problems created are bigger and more dramatic.

 

Ricciardi described the "Sea Lamprey" example, a nuisance species that paved the way for two other invaders.  By the 1950s, the sea lamprey invasion killed off most populations of native lake trout in the Great Lakes.  The removal of this natural predator paved the way for the explosion of smelt and alewife fish populations, which in turn reduced zooplankton and native planktivores, causing a decline in overall fish productivity in the system.
 

Return to Top of Page

Legal Disclaimers and Policy Statements

This page last updated by Miller Associates: Thursday, June 05, 2003

Website Address:
www.CQDJournal.com

or contact us at Miller Associates USA
phone (973) 377-0085

Click here to go to CQD Index page

Hot Events

CQD Index

Search Journals

CQD World Wire Events

Maritime Links

Miller Associates

Contact Us